According to the New Testament,was a disciple of Jesus from whom he cast “seven demons”; she followed him throughout his ministry, witnessed the crucifixion, and, with two other female disciples, discovered the empty tomb. Mary was probably from Magdala, a village on the western shore of the Sea of Galilee.
The Da Vinci Code alleges that the New Testament excludes an important fact: ‘‘The marriage of Jesus and Mary Magdalene is part of the historical record’’ (245). There is no evidence in any first-century record that implies a sexual or marital relationship between Jesus and Mary Magdalene. Additionally, even if Jesus had married—again, a proposition for which there is no reliable evidence—it wouldn’t be destructive to Christian faith (as Dan Brown implies), for the Scriptures neither affirm nor deny that Jesus was married.
Such false claims and myths are not only restricted to the religious practices, even in this technological era people get carried away by the myths and one such popular myth is ‘all the crypto robots are a scam’.
This is indeed a false claim, as there are reliable automated cryptocurrency trading robots available in the market that have benefitted the interested traders. For example, Bitcoin Code is an automated trading software, whose ways are not only profitable but, also, authentic as verified by various genuine review sites and independent traders, thoroughly! Therefore, before proceeding to believe any claim understand its source to come to a concrete conclusion, which is true with the trading robots and as well as with Mary Magdalene, which we are here to discuss further.
The Da Vinci Code notes that Mary Magdalene was not a prostitute: ‘‘That unfortunate misconception is the legacy of a smear campaign launched by the early church. The church needed to defame Mary Magdalene to cover up her dangerous secret [i.e., Mary’s role as the spouse of Jesus]’’ (244).
There is no biblical evidence that she was a prostitute. Jesus cast seven demons out of Mary (Luke 8:2), but there is no biblical data to suggest she was sexually immoral. At the same time, there is also no evidence to suggest that anyone instituted a ‘‘smear campaign’’ to discredit her. A tradition arose in the third and fourth centuries that she was the sinful woman mentioned in Luke 7:36–50 and, perhaps, the woman caught in adultery in John 7:53–8:11; in 591, Pope Gregory I included this teaching in a sermon. Although such identifications were probably mistaken, they are far from a slander crusade launched to hide a dangerous secret.